The Russian Academy of Sciences has replenished with 176 new academicians, 323 corresponding members and 63 foreign members. How complicated the nomination procedure is and what the status of a member of the academy gives today, Gazeta.Ru found out with the help of academicians.
As RAS President Academician Vladimir Fortov noted in his speech, the procedure for nomination and election of the RAS is complicated, he himself counted either six or five secret ballots that candidates for members of the Academy pass.
Indeed, the procedure itself began in April, when it was published distribution of vacancies by departments and sections of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Depending on the situation within the sections, the number of vacancies for the title of academicians and corresponding members of the RAS was announced.
At the same time, the rules are such that vacancies are indicated separately with and without age restrictions (up to 61 years).
Elections of members of the academy are held at least once every three years. In 2013, the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, which began, forced the postponement of the next elections, so the last time its composition was updated five years ago, and for natural reasons, new vacancies appeared in it over this considerable period.
“A lot of people died in our country, there were no elections for five years, during this time, unfortunately, a lot of people left us,” the first interlocutor explained to Gazeta.Ru.
For example, in the section of nuclear physics, which, together with the section of general physics and astronomy, make up the department of physical sciences, five vacancies were announced for the title of academician without age restrictions, two vacancies with age restrictions, and one for the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. For the title of Corresponding Member - six vacancies without restrictions, five with restrictions and one - for the Siberian branch.
Scientific organizations, scientific councils, as well as academicians and corresponding members have the right to nominate members of the academy.
Nominations are first considered by an expert committee within each department or section, which includes all or most of its academicians. At this event, academicians consider materials submitted by departments for candidates and recommend or do not recommend individual personalities.
“Academicians sit in the section and discuss for a long time who is worthy of the title.
They usually don’t talk about who is not worthy, no one expresses negative emotions, negative emotion is silence, ”said the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a member of the expert commission.
After that, a secret ballot takes place, which is carried out by filling out ballots. Formally, the decision of the expert commission is advisory in nature, which, however, plays a role in further voting within the section of the department - the names of those recommended will be at the top of the list of candidates.
In their decisions, expert commissions are guided by their assessments of the authority of scientists, the significance of the achievements that stand behind them. At the same time, objective scientometric indicators often play a secondary role. “What are the Hirschs (Hirsch index. - Gazeta.Ru)! Maybe someone remembers them, but in general, the people who are elected have strong works and discoveries, so the main criterion is scientific results, ”the interlocutor explained. Other circumstances are also taken into account - for example, if a person leads a strong team of experimenters, is the director of an institute, he is chosen to maintain control over institutions.
“A lot, of course, happens behind closed doors, but we really don’t have nepotism in the sense of children and grandchildren. There is nepotism when a teacher can intercede for his student, ”he added about the department of physical sciences.
After the expert commission, voting for candidates takes place within the section itself and the department, where all candidates are voted, but taking into account the opinion of the expert commission. Then, the candidates approved by the department are put on the voting ballot of the general meeting of the Academy of Sciences, which takes place on a non-alternative basis, where the scientist is most likely approved.
However, in the case of a controversial figure, members of the academy more than once "filled up" the candidacies of people.
“At one time, the honorary academician and some of his protégés passed through the departments. And the general meeting overwhelmed them, ”the first interlocutor explained. The academy may refuse to give the title of academician to "controversial" figures when it believes the individual has not earned the title, or believes it will be awarded for political reasons.
In recent times, a similar story was with the director, for whom 204 members cast their votes with a minimum of 248 votes (two-thirds of all participants).
There was a case when academicians refused to accept the Minister of the Atomic Industry and scientists, who, as some believe, were not elected on a national basis, into their ranks.
Despite the over-regulation of all stages, there is one informal procedure that is not spelled out in the rules - the so-called tea party with the president of the academy, which takes place after voting in expert commissions and before voting within departments. This is a tribute to a tradition that was inherited from the USSR Academy of Sciences, it was described in detail and with humor by the famous Soviet astrophysicist Iosif Shklovsky in his collection Echelon.
“By tradition, members of the branch are invited by the president to announce the results of the work of the selection committee, after which a preliminary exchange of views on the candidates begins. In the meantime, the servants are delivering rather thin tea with lemon and vases of cookies. First, in the presence of all members of the department, candidates for correspondent members are discussed, after which the correspondent members are shamefully, like schoolchildren from the teachers' council, expelled from the hall. But these are elderly figures - many of them are directors! — wrote the scientist.
This tradition has remained to this day, during the tea party members of the departments share their opinions with the president about the candidates, listen to his considerations. For example, Vladimir Fortov expressed general wishes that the candidates be younger, so that vacancies would not disappear during the voting. Vacancies can really disappear in those cases when a strong composition of candidates is selected and one of them fails to gain two-thirds of the votes.
Any member of the department can come to the tea party, however, some do not participate in it, considering it empty.
"Rogues" and "chansanettes"
There were no special scandals during the voting at the general meeting. True, two tendencies cannot be overlooked, which, however, were visible long before the vote. The example of Ruslan, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, winner of the Blaise Pascal medal in the field of materials science for 2011, one of the most cited Russian scientists, who was nominated from the materials science section, has become quite discussed in the scientific community.
“Within this section, there are strong corporate ties between several institutes located in Moscow, which have seized all power and choose each other regardless of scientific merit,” a second interlocutor explained to Gazeta.Ru. According to Gazeta.Ru, Valiev was disliked by quite a certain academician, so this is not the first time that Valiev has been "rolled". By the way, at the aforementioned tea party, Fortov raised this issue, to which it was said that Valiev's materials were not used in industry. “Firstly, they are used, and secondly, if you think like that, then in general half the sections should be closed,” the academician believes.
facebook.com
Be that as it may, the son of the chairman of the section, an academician, was elected for the vacancy of a correspondent member, which Valiev, among others, applied for.
“In terms of the number of chosen relatives, I'm afraid we have set a record. There are a lot of names of children of living academicians on the list,” the interlocutor added.
Only from the surnames that are heard are doctors and Irina Chazova, the daughter of the famous Kremlin cardiologist, who, following her father, headed the cardio center.
“We have estimated here that there are ten or twelve such cases out of five hundred, that is, at the level of 2%. We cannot ban this, it is illogical and wrong, because it puts the children of academicians outside the scientific field, ”the president of the Russian Academy of Sciences replied to a Gazeta.Ru correspondent when asked to comment on this trend.
The peculiar approach to elections in the department of medicine is evidenced by the fact that the number of vacancies for the title of academicians with age restrictions coincided with the number of candidates. And if in other departments the competition reached 20-30 people per place, in the department of medical sciences it was one person per place.
“In fact, 25 academicians will not be elected, but appointed, apparently, they understand the word “elections” differently than a big academy,” the interlocutor explained.
At the same time, a specialist in the field of polymer chemistry, a mega-grant Alexander, did not receive support from the Department of Medical Sciences. As the mathematician, the winner of the Fields Prize, did not receive support, with whom Kabanov convinced of the need to allocate 3.5 billion rubles. to support young scientists and other scientific projects in Russia.
The director of the State Astronomical Institute, the academician, does not hide his joy that several well-known astrophysicists have got into the academy. These are Oleg Korablev, head of the department of planetary physics at IKI RAS, under whose leadership the device was created, which was recently sent to Mars; Marat Gilfanov - Leading Researcher, IKI RAS; - Head of the scientific program of the space experiment "Radioastron"; - Scientific Director of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Undoubtedly, the well-deserved title of academician was given to a famous physicist, who was dismissed from the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics a year ago with a scandal. Danilov is a well-known scientist in Russia and in the West, a recognized specialist in the field of elementary particle physics, a laureate of the Planck and Karpinsky Prizes. He is a member of the CERN Advisory Board, scientific councils of a number of international experiments, participates in an experiment to search for dark matter, heads departments at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology and.
What does the title of academician or correspondent member give today? Less than in Soviet times, but also a lot. In addition to honor and respect, this is a certain, and lifelong, monetary allowance.
In 2013, at the height of the reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the stipend was raised for members of the Academy, and academicians began to receive 100 thousand rubles, corresponding members - 50 thousand.
In addition, they can, if necessary, call a car from the academic garage for one-time trips. And the members of the academy are attached to the polyclinic of the Administration of the President of Russia; they, along with their family members, were assigned there last summer. There is an opportunity to use the services of various resort establishments, one of which is the Uzkoye sanatorium in Moscow, and others.
However, there is another privilege that comes with being a member of the RAS. “I also have the right to have a civil memorial service for me at the Academy of Sciences. In the "Golden Brains" (the building of the Russian Academy of Sciences on Leninsky Prospekt. - "Gazeta.Ru") there is a funeral hall, and when members of the academy die, a civil memorial service takes place there, ”the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences joked.
For a complete list of selected Academicians and Corresponding Members, please visit the website
MOSCOW, November 24 - RIA Novosti. The RAS ruled out the possibility of officials leaving the academy, since membership in it is for life. At the same time, the organization noted that each applicant for an "academic" place made a decision to participate in the elections independently.
The day before, President Vladimir Putin threatened to fire civil servants-academicians to give them time for scientific research.
Tulokhonov: only officials are forbidden to combine work with membership in the Russian Academy of SciencesThe President said unequivocally about the executive authorities, about the civil service, in which it is really impossible to combine activities, this "absolutely does not apply to parliamentarians," Senator Arnold Tulokhonov believes.At the end of October, 25 officials ran in the elections to the Russian Academy of Sciences, 14 of whom received an academic title as a result.
In particular, Senator Arnold Tulokhonov became an academician, and Deputy Interior Minister Alexander Savenkov, head of the investigative department, Vasily Khristoforov, head of the registration and archival funds department of the FSB, and Igor Sheremet, deputy director for science of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, became corresponding members.
Only scientific work
At a meeting of the Council for Science and Education, Putin recalled that at the end of 2015 he asked his colleagues not to take part in the elections to the Russian Academy of Sciences. The head of state then explained his position by the fact that it is difficult to combine scientific and managerial activities.
"Nevertheless, some of our colleagues from the Presidential Administration, from the Ministry of Education, from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, from the Ministry of Defense, from the Federal Security Service, from the FSB and from some other departments took part in the election (to the Academy of Sciences) and were elected ", Putin said.
RAS President Vladimir Fortov told the President that all candidates assured that they had received permission to participate in the competition. As a result, the officials passed the tests "without any exceptions or exceptions."
"I think that I will have to give them the opportunity to do science, because, apparently, their scientific activity is much more important than the performance of some routine administrative duties in government and administration," Putin said.
"The question arises whether they can engage in scientific research in full with the desired results," the president added.
Personal initiative
Mikhail Paltsev, Chief Scientific Secretary of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said that each official personally made the decision to participate in the elections. At the same time, he admitted that the academy knew about Putin's recommendation.
"We accepted them according to scientific criteria. Everyone who participated in the elections met these requirements," Paltsev said.
According to the procedure, each applicant must speak to the academicians six times, after each speech, the current members of the academy vote on the candidates.
Meanwhile, a RIA Novosti source in the Russian Academy of Sciences said that if the Academy members decide to give up the title, they will not be able to do so.
"These appeals will not be accepted at all, because they do not comply with the charter (RAS)," the source said.
The head of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladimir Fortov, later said that none of the newly minted scientists had yet asked to be expelled from the academy.
The end goal is clear
Meanwhile, presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted that Putin has clearly stated his position on this issue.
“All the relevant departments unequivocally listened to what the president said. Now they are looking into this situation,” Peskov told reporters.
"But the ultimate goal is clearly defined by the president," Peskov concluded.
What gives an academic title
The Russian Academy of Sciences is the largest state academy of sciences in Russia, now it includes 944 academicians, all of whom are elected for life.
Formally, the title "Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences" is not considered an academic title, but it gives a number of privileges. Among them is the right to a monthly bonus to the official salary at the place of work.
Academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the list of which is replenished every year, are the holders of the highest status in domestic science. A citizen of the Russian Federation who publishes scientific works of great social importance in various fields of knowledge can count on the title of academician. In 2017, there are almost a thousand academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Russia, to be precise - 932. According to the charter, their main and only goal is to enrich science with their achievements.
How to become an academic?
In 2012 he became a doctor of sciences. His research interests also include electron cooling of beams, their generation, storage rings, and object-oriented programming.
Academician at 32
Before all those living today, another physicist, Alexander Nikolaevich Skrinsky, received the title. He was born in Orenburg in 1936.
Engaged in experimental problems and Studied accelerators and high energy physics. With his participation, the latest types of colliders were developed and created. Corresponding member since 1968 At that time he was only 32 years old. Two years later he received the title of "Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences".
Later he developed a method of electron cooling and detection of polarized beams. He played a decisive role in the development of applied physics, as well as in the creation of the latest types of lasers and the production of beam technologies.
Physiologist-academician
In 2016, full members of the Russian Academy of Sciences accepted the physiologist Lev Girshevich Magazanik into their ranks. To receive an honorary title at such an age is a kind of record, at least among living academics.
Lev Girshevich was born in Odessa in 1931. In the field of his scientific research - the work of ion channels, the effect of neurotoxins on various types and types of receptors. Among his inventions are unique tools that made it possible to study the organization of molecules in membranes.
Magazanik conducted joint research with foreign scientists around the world - in France, Switzerland, Great Britain, Germany. The result of his work was the creation of new drugs that help to establish interaction between neurons in healthy and sick
Physicians among academicians
Academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences are elected in 12 departments and sections today. Medicine occupies one of the key places in this list. Most of the academics are women. One of them is an obstetrician-gynecologist Leyla Vladimirovna Adamyan.
She was born in Tbilisi. Educated in Moscow. From 1989 to the present day, he has been in charge of the department of operative gynecology at the corresponding research institute. In 2004 she was awarded the title of academician.
Leyla Adamyan is famous for being fluent in all types of gynecological operations known to science today. The objects of her research are the use of X-rays in reproductive medicine. He works a lot on the treatment of pregnant women and children.
Thanks to her, modern surgical technologies are being used today, which have made it possible to at least halve the severity and consequences of adhesions that occur after gynecological operations.
Academic mathematicians
Another field of knowledge, which is traditionally preferred by academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the list of which is replenished after that, is mathematics.
Today, one of the most famous scientists in this field is Ludwig Dmitrievich Faddeev, who became a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences back in 1976. He specializes in the field of mathematical physics.
Most of his works and research are devoted to solving three-body problems in quantum mechanics. In modern science, this problem is known under his name - the Faddeev equation. He also deals with the Schrödinger equation. He is the author of two hundred scientific papers and monographs.
They can be proud that among them there is the Russian Academy of Sciences. Mathematicians devote a lot of time to theoretical work, however, it is often appreciated. In 2008, Ludwig Faddeev received the Shao Prize in Hong Kong, which is annually awarded to the best scientists in the world. He received the award in the nomination "Mathematics" with another compatriot Vladimir Arnold. Their contribution to the popularization of mathematical physics was appreciated.
An amazing story: for 10 days now, an event has been taking place before our eyes that is completely unprecedented in scale, in significance (without any exaggeration, one can say - world significance) and the authority of the people taking part in it, and very little is known about it. That is, of course, in narrow professional circles, they talk about it, discuss it, follow the development of news. But in general, the whole plot remains completely "corporate", even if you want - "departmental".
This is some very instructive example of how strange, absurd, idle and senseless the current Russian information environment is. Moreover, why the television and semi-official press are silent is understandable, of course. But why social media, networks and communities have remained aloof from the sensation is a question for a separate study. That is, it cannot be said, of course, that absolutely no one knew about it. But the resonance certainly does not correspond to the true weight of what is happening ...
I'm talking about the letter that appeared on the website of the "Society of Scientific Workers" on July 1, and the mass protest action of scientists that followed the publication.
For reference: ONR is such an informal public organization created by a large group of scientists actively working in Russia and abroad about a year and a half ago. By the way, it was never possible to suspect ONR of love for the current Russian Academy of Sciences. As for how Russian science is organized, how it is managed and how it is financed, the statements and documents of the ONR have always spoken extremely sharply and directly. Actually, the creation of this organization was motivated in its founding documents by the fact that it is no longer possible to put up with the current situation in Russia. "alienation of power from scientists, unprecedented in either developed or catching up countries" and with the position "in which leading world-class researchers are reduced to the level of disenfranchised employees. As a result, over the past decade, Russia has slipped from 16th to 27th place in the world in terms of the total citation of scientific articles ...".
In general, if there is an organization in the scientific community that is determined to radically reform the Russian Academy of Sciences, then this is precisely the Society of Scientific Workers.
And now it is the Society of Scientific Workers that has become the platform on which the most powerful and convincing protest action for the scientific community is unfolding, directed against the Duma bill on the "confiscation reform" of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
The text of the appeal, around which events are developing, is extremely concise. I would say that he is defiantly concise. The authors make it clear to the addressees that, in general, there is nothing to convince them of, and there is no need to bargain, and there is nothing to ask for. Just a protest, nothing more. Just an expression of indignation and contempt for the organizers of such a "reform". Here is the text in its entirety, from first to last word:
"To the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin
Chairman of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation V.I. Matvienko
Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation S.E. Naryshkin
To the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation D.A. Medvedev
Expressing categorical rejection of the draft Federal Law "On the Russian Academy of Sciences, the reorganization of state academies of sciences and amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation" 305828-6, sent to the State Duma, we declare our refusal to join the new "RAS" if the law is adopted, since we do not consider it a legitimate and worthy successor and replacement for the existing Russian Academy of Sciences, founded by Peter I.
During these 10 days, this statement was signed by the real, non-fictional, real elite of Russian science in almost full strength.
For the kind of dissertation research I've been immersed in over the past few months, I have to interact quite a lot with different members of the scientific community. And I must tell you that my interlocutors are completely dumbfounded. No one, under any circumstances, expected anything like this. The most famous, the most respected, the most influential, the most cited, the most brilliant of the active Russian scientists of THE LAST THREE GENERATIONS, who have achieved the greatest academic success, who have rightfully earned their titles of academicians and correspondent members, are now putting their signatures on the refusal to cover up with their names the thieves' reform imposed on Putin's administration.
Because this reform has nothing to do with the real tasks of the revival and development of Russian science. Because this reform is in no way connected with the true point of view of those in whose name they are trying to push through: the Russian scientists themselves. Because this reform is a bright, impudent and demonstrative declaration of the contempt of officials and near-Kremlin swindlers for the true interests of Russian scientists, the Russian educated class, and Russian society in general.
Do you know why I consider this event extremely important even against the backdrop of the whole very disturbing and gloomy political picture of the day? Even against the backdrop of the inhuman, torture trial in the "May 6 Case", which is organized to intimidate and demoralize us. Against the background of the shameless trial of Navalny and Officerov, falsified and distorted from the first to the last word. Against the backdrop of a cheap booth into which the Moscow mayor's office, with the approval of the Kremlin, turns the most important city elections. Against the backdrop of ever-increasing repressions against civil activists, the total destruction of NGOs, the consistent stifling of the free press in Russia...
Because in this story we see that people who only yesterday considered themselves guaranteed from "all these stupid things of yours", lived with the conviction that "all this political fuss does not concern them", proceeded from the fact that something was wrong with them "Nothing like that will definitely happen," they suddenly discover that they are not in any tank at all, and in no house at all. It suddenly turns out that the punishment for indifference, for arrogance, for the readiness to withdraw from public life, for civic deafness and blindness, is inevitable. If Russia has become a totalitarian country, sooner or later this totalitarianism will get to you. Whether you are at least academics, at least Nobel laureates.
In recent weeks, the academic "corporation" has received many bitter, sometimes irritated reproaches. Occasionally they also sound ordinary gloating. More often - disappointment, despondency. And now - such a turn.
Right now, these people - the most worthy, most deserved, wisest and most respected of Russian scientists - are learning this hard lesson before our eyes. And I really hope that the trauma that will now be inflicted on them by this disappointment, this insight and this despair will turn out to be strong enough. I hope the wound doesn't heal for long. I think that the memory of these days will remain in these people now forever.
Yesterday there was a message that now many of these signatories intend to enter a new community, the purpose of which will be to fight against arbitrary power for the true, vital interests of the Russian scientific corporation. The community will be called - by the date of publication of the appeal - "Club 1 July". I wonder what this struggle for the "future of Russian science" will look like apart from the movement for civil society in Russia as a whole. Is it possible to somehow "isolate" your corporate interest here? Or will it still turn out that one cannot live without the other?
Just read this list of "refusal academics". As of yesterday morning, there were 71 names in it - it is not in alphabetical order, but in the order of signing. There will probably be more today. On the ONR website, the list is given in a completely dry form - only the title, surname and initials. And I asked my fellow scientists to add a minimum of background information so that the uninitiated would understand at least which of the academics is from.
See:
1. Academician V.E. Zakharov, theoretical physicist, mathematician, Institute of Theoretical Physics. Landau and Physical Institute. Lebedev RAS, 74 years old
2. Academician A.V. Kryazhimsky, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 64 years old
3. Academician V.A. Rubakov, theoretical physicist, Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 58 years old
4. Academician D.V. Shirkov, theoretical physicist, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Dubna, 85 years old
5. Academician Yu.L. Ershov, mathematician, Institute of Mathematics SB RAS, 73 years old
6. Academician V.M. Kotlyakov, geographer, Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honorary President of the Russian Geographical Society, 81 years old
7. Academician N.S. Dikansky, physicist, Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, 71 years old
8. Academician V.A. Vasiliev, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A.Steklova RAS, President of the Moscow Mathematical Society, 57 years old
9. Academician L.V. Keldysh, theoretical physicist, Physical Institute. Lebedev RAS, 82 years old
10. Academician S.M. Stishov, experimental physicist, Institute for High Pressure Physics named after V.I. L. F. Vereshchagin RAS, 75 years old
11. Academician A.A. Starobinsky, theoretical physicist, Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 years old
12. Academician V.L. Yanin, historian, Faculty of History of Moscow State University, 84 years old
13. Academician A.A. Abrikosov, theoretical physicist, Nobel Prize winner, Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics RAS, 65 years old
14. Academician V. B. Betelin, mathematician, Research Institute of System Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, RRC “Kurchatov Institute”, 67 years old.
15. Academician R.I. Nigmatulin, mechanic, Institute of Oceanology. P.P. Shirshov RAS, 73 years old
16. Academician V.V. Dmitriev, experimental physicist, Kapitsa Institute for Physical Problems, 55 years old
17. Academician M.V. Sadovsky, physicist, Institute of Electrophysics RAS, Yekaterinburg, 65 years old
18. Academician M.A. Grachev, biologist, Limnological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 74 years old
19. Academician A.P. Kuleshov, mathematician, Institute for Information Transmission Problems. A.A. Kharkevich RAS, 67 years old
20. Academician V.B. Timofeev, physicist, Institute of Solid State Physics RAS, 76 years old
21. Academician V. A. Dybo, linguist, Center for Comparative Studies of the Institute of Oriental Cultures and Antiquity of the Russian State Humanitarian University, 82 years old
22. Academician G.M. Eliashberg, theoretical physicist, Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 82 years old
23. Academician A.V. Chaplik, physicist, Institute of Semiconductor Physics. A.V. Rzhanova, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 75 years old
24. Academician S.S. Gershtein, physicist, Institute for High Energy Physics, 83 years old
25. Academician R.Z. Sagdeev, physicist, University of Maryland, 80 years old
26. Academician A.V. Gaponov-Grekhov, physicist, Institute of Applied Physics RAS, 87 years old
27. Academician N.S. Kardashev, astronomer, Astrospace Center of the Physical Institute of the Academy of Sciences, 81 years old
28. Academician Yu.N.Pariyskiy, astronomer, Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 81 years old
29. Academician R.A. Suris, physicist, Physico-Technical Institute. A.F. Ioffe RAS, 76 years old
30. Corresponding member Yu.I. Manin, mathematician, Northwestern University (USA), 76 years old
31. Corresponding member I.V. Volovich, theoretical physicist, mathematician, Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 66 years old
32. Corresponding member A.Yu. Morozov, theoretical physicist, Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 51 years old
33. Corresponding member P.I.Arseev, theoretical physicist, Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 52 years old
34. Corresponding member M.I.Vysotsky, theoretical physicist, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 59 years old
35. Corresponding member K.P. Zybin, theoretical physicist, Department of Theoretical Physics. Tamma, 54 years old
36. Corresponding member V.N. Gavrin, experimental physicist, Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 72 years old
37. Corresponding member I.B. Khriplovich, theoretical physicist, Institute of Nuclear Physics RAS, Novosibirsk, 76 years old
38. Corresponding member V.I. Danilov-Danilyan, economist, environmentalist, Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 75 years old
39. Corresponding member V.E. Balakin, physicist, Institute of Nuclear Physics. Budker, 68 years old
40. Corresponding member O.N. Solomina, geographer, Institute of Geography RAS, 53 years old
41. Corresponding member N.G. Smirnov, biologist, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 years old
42. Corresponding member A.A.Soloviev, mathematician, geophysicist, International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics RAS, 65 years old
43. Corresponding member S.Yu.Nemirovsky, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 39 years old
44. Corresponding Member A.A. Belavin, theoretical physicist, Landau Institute of Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 71 years old
45. Corresponding Member I.I. Tkachev, theoretical physicist, Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 56 years old
46. Corresponding member M.I. Yalandin, experimental physicist, Institute of Electrophysics, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 56 years old
47. Corresponding member E.L. Ivchenko, theoretical physicist, Physico-Technical Institute. Ioffe, St. Petersburg, 67 years old
48. Corresponding member SV Ivanov, mathematician, St. Petersburg Department of the Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 41 years old
49. Corresponding member B.L. Ioffe, theoretical physicist, Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 86 years old
50. Corresponding member N.N. Sibeldin, physicist, Lebedev Physical Institute RAS, 70 years old
51. Corresponding Member A.V. IN AND. Vernadsky, 59 years old
52. Corresponding member E.V. Shchepin, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 61 years old
53. Corresponding member S.K. Gulev, physicist, Institute of Oceanology. P.P. Shirshov RAS, 54 years old
54. Corresponding member Yu.G. Makhlin, theoretical physicist, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 43 years old
55. Corresponding member E.A. Khazanov, experimental physicist, Nizhny Novgorod State University, 48 years old
56. Corresponding member A.A. Tolstonogov, mathematician, Institute of System Dynamics and Control Theory SB RAS, 73 years old
57. Corresponding Member I. A. Panin, mathematician, St. Petersburg Department of the Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklova RAS, 54 years old
58. Corresponding member A.I. Ivanchik, historian, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 48 years old
59. Corresponding member D.I. Trubetskov, theoretical physicist, Saratov Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 75 years old
60. Corresponding member DV Treshchev, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 48 years old
61. Corresponding member R.L. Smelyansky, mathematician, Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, Moscow State University, 62 years old
62. Corresponding member A.V. Dybo, linguist, Institute of Linguistics RAS, 54 years old
63. Corresponding member A.A. Razborov, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 50 years old
64. Corresponding member L.D. Beklemishev, mathematician, Mathematical Institute. V.A. Steklov RAS, 45 years old
65. Corresponding member V.V. Brazhkin, physicist, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 51 years old
66. Corresponding member K.E. Degtyarev, geologist, Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 49 years old
67. Corresponding member A.M. Sergeev, physicist, Institute of Applied Physics RAS, 58 years old
68. Corresponding member A.B. Borisov, theoretical physicist, Institute of Physics of Metals, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 65 years old
69. Corresponding member N.N. Rozanov, physicist, State Optical Institute named after V.I. S.I. Vavilova, 72 years old
70. Corresponding member M.I. Rabinovich, physicist, University of California at San Diego (USA), 72 years old
71. Corresponding member A.K. Murtazaev, physicist, Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 52 years old
